GHQ  Historic Corregidor  | Harbor Defense of Manila & Subic Bays  |  Corregidor Under Siege  Retaking Corregidor  |  Rediscovering Corregidor  | Units & Personnel  |  Map Room Secret Corregidor PX  |  Now Showing |  Archives  |  Bulletin Board | Galleries  |  Mail Call | Links 503d Heritage Bn.

Part 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well done, you're with us still! This part shall concentrate on  JN-25, which was the code system used by the Japanese to transmit the final instructions for the attack on Pearl Harbor.  The issue for your consideration is "what was the state of knowledge of this code amongst the various Allies prior to 7 December 1941?"

When you finish reading this, you might change your mind about the history of WW2. 

But don't jump too quick, for we'll then re-examine these revisionist views, and come around full circle. 

The story so far:...)

 

CRYPTOGRAPHY - ONE STORY IS GOOD UNTIL ANOTHER IS REVEALED (cont'd)

(PART TWO)

  JN-25D

 

 Bruce Lee's
Marching Orders
answers Rusbridger and Nave thus:

 

Now it's harder to put a stop to a headline-making, money-machine conspiracy theory than it is to kill a rattlesnake with a short-handled hoe. But this writer has done so. First, by interviewing Duane Whitlock, who, from November 1940 through March 16, 1942, was a radioman first class doing decryption and preparing intelligence reports based on Japanese traffic analysis for US Navy at Cavite and Corregidor. Whitlock points out that the Japanese Navy changed its code in the JN-25 series several times in 1941. Once in early August. Again on December 4.

"I know from firsthand experience," Whitlock says, "that from the fall of 1941 through the attack on Pearl Harbor we did not read any JN-25 codes. The first message we read of JN-25 on Corregidor was on March thirteenth, 1942. This message was the one in which the Japanese used the designator 'AF' to identify Midway. Nobody, including the British, with whom we worked closely, was reading JN-25 on a current basis up to the start of the war." (Whitlock later won the Bronze Star for his role in breaking the Japanese codes that led to victory at the Battle of Midway.)

This writer also interviewed Capt. Altert T. Pelletier, USN (ret.), who, in 1941, was assigned as chief yeoman to OP-20-GZ in the old Navy Building on Constitution Avenue in Washington.

"In 1941 we were reading only a tiny fraction of JN-25, at the very most ten percent of a given message." he says. "More troublesome was the fact that we recieved the intercepts via slow boat from the Far East, about two months after they were intercepted. They were horribly out of date by the time we worked on them. I was a code breaker. I specialized in place names, dates, ship names, arrival and departure dates. I tried to put meanings into code groups. But I wasn't a linguist. We didn't have enough linguists at the time. None were assigned to our office to work on JN-25."

Capt. Prescott Currier, USN (Ret.), is the third man to confirm to this writer that the Navy was not breaking JN-25 codes prior to Pearl Harbor. He was involved in breaking codes in Washington before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Later he served in the same capacity at Pearl Harbor.

"We read the occasional small message in JN-25 before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor," he says. "But never did we read JN-25 on a general basis, because we didn't have the staff to do this. Later, during the war, when we were concentrating on JN-25 full blast, we were able to read only five or six percent of the total JN-25 intercepts."

This writer asked: Did the intercepted but undecrypted JN-25 messages prior to December 7, 1941, reveal the Japanese intentions to attack Pearl Harbor?

According to Currier, in 1946, after the congressional hearings into Pearl Harbor, the Navy assigned a group of cryptologists to study some twenty thousand previously unread JN-25 intercepts. Of this number, one thousand intercepts made prior to Pearl Harbor were carefully analyzed.

"In these particular intercepts," says Currier, "there are a couple of dozen messages that give enough solid evidence to show the Japanese are going to attack Pearl Harbor."

It is not until 1946, then - five years after Pearl Harbor - that the US Navy knows for sure that the JN-25 codes carried specific information that could have prevented Pearl Harbor.

 

 

 

 

   

© 1999 Paul Whitman

 

Some contributor has politely suggested that because this is  a Corregidor site,  issues of cryptography have little place in it.   Corregidor has many threads of history which intersect with it and the people who populated it, and one of the more important has been the shadowy world of radio interception and code breaking.  If all I do is whet some reader's appetite for further reading on codes, then I'll be happy.    

JN-25  |   PURPLE

DECODE ROOM

Corregidor - Then & Now GHQ Coast Artillery - Harbor Defenses | 503d  RHQ |  503d PRCT Heritage Bn. | Rock Force | Board

H Version 01.27.13