FIELD NOTE:
|
PLACE: |
CORREGIDOR |
DATE: |
6
JULY 2011 |
LOCALE: |
GOAL
POST RIDGE |
OBSERVATION: |
CONFLICTING INFORMATION IS EXAMINED |
BY: |
JOHN MOFFITT |
|
REF: FOTS2/110706 |
One thing for sure
is that Corregidor will always have conflicting information regarding
certain events or locations which cannot be verified beyond doubt. It seems
that no matter how much material you cover or any source you produce, some
comments will not agree. One example of this is the exact location of a 1945
battle site known as Goal Post Ridge.
Although this ridge is mentioned elsewhere there seems to be two main
accounts of events involving this ridge and its location. One account comes
from Paul J. Cain, Company Commander, I Co, 34th Inf. Regt. He was an
officer directly involved in the action. The other account comes from Jan
Valtin who was a combat reporter. By his own admission, he used second hand
reports for his book. From this information alone, I know who I tend to
believe but you can make up your own minds.
The Belote Brothers state on page 229 that they got their text from Valatin
so I will ignore them.
Let’s examine text from both Cain and Valtin. Follow this link to read about
Goal Post Ridge from Paul Cain.
GOAL POST RIDGE - Paul Cain
He states that "K Company on top of Malinta Hill had 2 lower areas to their
left flank" (i.e. north of them). There are two hills here, one to the north
is 200 feet high and one to the NE is 175 feet high. Cain says the lower of
the two (the most easterly one) was Goal Post Ridge.
Also, he makes a statement about Infantry Point being 150 yards NE of his
position. If understand him correctly, his position at that moment was Goal
Post Ridge. From the end of Infantry Point to the top of the lower hill is
about 130 yards. Infantry Point to the higher hill is about 220 yards so
much farther that he states. This statement about the distance to Infantry
Point reinforces the idea of the lower hill being Goal Post Ridge.
Paul Cain uses no maps in his account of this battle.
Follow this link to read about Goal Post Ridge from Jan Valtin.
http://rockforce.org/rock_force/valtin/valtin_01.html
On page 4 of that link, read the description about the naming of Goal Post
Ridge. Jan Valtin mentions “two rises in the ground” between the guys on top
of Malinta Hill and Malinta Point. (Keep these two locations in mind when
you read my comments about his sketch below).
I believe he is referring to the 175 and 200 ft high hills but they are not
between him and Malinta Point. He calls the taller one Goal Post Ridge. This
and calling the shorter one Little Knob disagrees with Cain.
A third theory is that Goal Post Ridge actually was somewhere along the
ridge between the top of Malinta Hill and Malinta Point. This idea may have
come from the sketch Valtin used in his book. It is a very poor quality and
geographically incorrect sketch that certainly can cause confusion.

Jan Valtin’s sketch from his book. I relabelled some of it for clarity and
added a few more locations. Note his ‘A’ and ‘B’ designations.
As you head east from Bottomside you do come to Malinta Point (C) first.
Next is Engineer Point (D) and then Artillery Point (E).
The 200 ft high hill (A) is NOT south of Malinta Point.
The 175 ft high hill (B) is NOT between Malinta Point and Engineer Point.
The Malinta Tunnel North entrance is NOT between Bottomside and Malinta
Point.
For comparison to Valtin’s sketch, here is a map showing the correct layout
of all points of interest.

Along the ridge from
the top of Malinta Hill to Malinta Point I see only one pipe. There is a
piece of frayed cable on a cable anchor of some sort nearby. In my opinion,
this ridge is not the area being discussed by either Cain or Valtin.

Single 3-inch pipe embedded into a larger pipe.

Cable anchor.
To summarize, Valtin
calls the 200ft hill Goal Post Ridge and the shorter one Little Knob. Cain
calls the shorter one Goal Post Ridge.
Last Saturday I walked extensively along both of these lower areas/hills.
The western one at 200 ft high is narrow and steep on both sides. There are
foxholes still there on top and on the side facing east. A couple foxholes
are also on the north slope just before the cliff. Definitely no pipes up
here.
The lower hill at 175 ft is sloped but not quite as steep on the western
side. It is steeper on the eastern side which would have faced the Japanese
at the time. This hill has quite a few foxholes. By far most of them are
along the eastern side but I also see some on the north side and on top. The
lowest positions at road level facing east are five foxholes in a row.
So why am I bringing up this subject now? On top of this 175 ft lower hill I
see two metal 3 inch diameter pipes sticking vertically out of the ground 14
feet apart. Today they are cut off to a bit less than three feet high. I
cannot say how high they were in 1945. (Scrappers may have taken these easy
targets in later years). They sure look like goal posts to me. This agrees
with what Paul Cain says.

My hand cutters are on top of the pipe for a size reference.
A short section of larger diameter pipe surrounds the 3 inch pipe.

My hand cutters are on top of the pipe for a size reference.

A view of both pipes. They may have been much taller in 1945. Look like goal
posts?

The Pipe Locations
I am trying to determine if we have enough evidence to say exactly where
Goal Post Ridge was located. Finding two pipes is not conclusive evidence
but strongly points to the shorter hill being our prime suspect.
If anyone has further information or even opinions about Goal Post Ridge,
please feel free to add it here. Discussion makes us all think.
|